The events at Portland today involving Andy Ngo have made it abundantly clear that city officials, foreign money, police chiefs, federal law officials, and entrenched political families in the West Coast are pulling the strings for a widespread intimidation strategy in advance of the 2020 elections. Anyone expecting militias, citizens, police, private contractors, journalists, moral figures, thought leaders, or any part of the American legal system to effectively counter the actions of these hopelessly brainwashed and violent mobs is not only a fool, but has intentionally lived a sheltered life where they actively avoid ever being targeted by such intimidation. Many of us have spent years adapting to the round-the-clock watch by leftist media opportunists, federal panopticon surveillance, and Silicon Valley twerps who abuse their positions for Right Side of History points. It's time to put that training to use and start implementing Gnostic Warfare tactics to target the AIs that power Antifa.

What is Antifa?

 Antifa is not a "grass-roots" movement. It's not a reaction against fascism. Antifa is the manifestion that Chris Hedges warned us when he stated a need for the professional revolutionist in 2014. Yes, Antifa has a storied history in Europe, but what happened between pre-World War 2 and now? Did Antifa motivations take a seventy year vacation just because the Americans and Russians forced Germany to surrender? Of course not. Antifa is not a philosophy... it is a tactic.

 In 2008, the powers that be determined stealing all of our land and bailing out foriengers over US citizens was the way to recovery. This means that the United States became a vassal of the globalization it expended ludicrous amounts of military assets to secure. To ensure perpetual vassalization, domestic enforcement is required and Antifa is one of several candidates contending to be the primary means of that enforcement. If you have objections to corporations lobbying to redirect your healthcare contributions into non-citizen cheap labor as a sign-on bonus, Antifa is angling to be one of several models of last-stop enforcement to be deployed to ensure policy compliance.

What is Gnostic Warfare?

 Gnostic Warfare is a holistic analysis of attack vectors focused on compromising the common elements shared between multiple modes of cognition. This means exploring the weaknesses of Kurweilian singularities, posthuman neurochimera, hiveminds, and neural network ecosystems. (I'll refer to these as "gnostic constructs" from here on out) I'm very certain you are currently unable to connect the relationships between these mythical congitive constructs and Antifa, but hear me out because the connection is there.

 Employees within Silicon Valley sympathize heavily with Antifa and act on that sympathy in the form of material assistance, intelligence support, and coordination. Such employees might:

• Tweak algorithms to provide favoritism in search results.
• Heavily favor ad placement for Antifa-friendly parties.
• Intentionally watering down facial recognition technology to protect individual Antifa members.
• Altering or hiding data requested by law enforcement that might identify core Antifa leadership.
• Providing blackmail from their massive data collection operations on police chiefs, police unions, and city officials to reduce law enforcement effectiveness.

 With such corporate backing, sympathetic tech workers are most certainly tuning their AI strategies to provide support their Antifa comrades. Identifying such technical favoritism means cutting off identifiying the employees around those AI products.

 Google isn't the only backer of Antifa. They also have help from powerful corporations and well-funded political machines. Each of these backers provide money, training, and intelligence support for Antifa. Each of these supporters have dependencies on artificial intelligence, neural networks, machine learning, and data science. The goal is to identify how Silicon Valley is utilizing these gnostic constructs and then undermining them. With the training review, you will be able to identify corrupt public officials, detect money laundering between shadow players, identify weaknesses of sympathetic billionaires and corporate board members, use metadata and signals analysis to discover ineffective law enforcement practices that favor Antifa, and uncover the bribes of dishonest journalists... all from targeting the AI ecosystems of several companies.

Why focus on AI over political battlegrounds or street demonstrations?

The dream of every social justice princeling is to have an army of perfectly loyal machines ensuring reality complies to their moral framework. Low maintenance, low energy costs, and low feedback is exactly the type of enforcement schedule that social justice advocates yearn for. Therefore, social justice at peak efficiency requires gnostic constructs as enforcers, first as a policy of nudging, then as social enforcers, then as physical goons.

AI security does not exist and those working on it are mired in a naive monoculture that can be fractured. Every weakness in these princeling fantasies of total control starts with a human operator whose work is essential for the performance of various gnostic constructs. Once the operator is discovered, they can be made to influence the results of a machine learning process, a data science policy, or a data lake query. Antifa unknowingly relies on a large number of AI policies that amplify their legal and cultural infallibility.

 In short, with Gnostic Warfare training, you will be able to identify AI dependencies that empower Antifa and manipulate them to reduce their legal protections and operational capacity.

 By 2005, Operation Enduring Freedom was well on its way to become today's Forever Wars. Democrats of all stripes celebrated the entire affair as a chance to resurrect the 1960s and, had it not been for the internet, it would have worked. The pre-social media internet responded to the war as a landscape of scattered tribes and sociopathic personalities all believing themselves to be the one true anti-war prophet, charged with the holiest of tasks: restore peak Boomer culture and love the world, man. The internet allowed for trite conflict, spats, and brand territoriality, which successfully prevented any serious domestic opposition to the War on Terror. But how was that possible? Isn't anti-war politics full of vibrant youth who are always right about everything and can resolve their disagreements for the greater good at all times? How could such pure idealism be so easily dismantled?

 In paleo-communication methodologies, violence always looms as a potential outcome. Violence manifests throughout conversation in subtle ways and almost every Boomer-inspired media junkie at the time was excessively trained in the basic pilpul techniques. By engaging in passive-aggressive hairsplitting in the form of mockery, satire, dishonesty, and reframing, peak Boomer culture weaponized itself to inflame legacy honor cultures in the hopes to spin the instigated violence to a dotting middle-class media consumers as profitable victimization. Years of overplaying this strategy to punish *"the brutality"* of nationalism (and, thus, promote globalism as the only viable savior of mankind) desensitized the petty consumerati and gradually raised their tolerance of bloodshed and carnage. On the internet, using violence to trigger the middle-class isn't possible, which means Boomer pilpul overuse became all escalation and no conclusion. Without violence, territorial disputes could not be resolved which prevented the organic creation of effective hierarchies to channel anti-war sentiment.

 The peak Boomer expectations of dialect materialist heroism in the form of anti-imperial posturing had finally been destroyed by the fragmentation of the internet. The expectant participants were not receptive to this weakness and relied heavily on their mighty historical pedigrees and prestige of anti-imperialism. After all, the peak Boomer period aggressively validated cultural Marxism and postmodernism during the advent of the television, so why interrupt a winning formula? They didn't realize they were at the digital battle of the Somme, mindlessly marching into the communication equivalent of a Maxim gun. I watched this immensely effective diffusion take place in real-time and I was routinely harassed by my Marxist contemporaries for pointing it out. When I told them that reliance on middle-class morality had to be abandoned, I was demonized for not doubling down on appealing to Clown World white women for another thirty years. When I said petrodollar was the true heart of capitalism and requested a refocus, I was crucified for giving WalMart a pass. When I said the oil wars were about preventing oil access to China, they went after my jobs because the acceptable narrative was that the wars were about taking oil for ourselves, not depriving it from other nations that needed it. It became apparent that the Marxists and the self-appointed anti-establishment types were on total emotional autopilot and had recklessly and willfully abandoned their critical thinking disciplines. The neoconservatives had successfully dominated the entire media narrative surrounding the wars and it was under these conditions my trajectory into being an ex-Marxist began.

 I was interested in how these ex-Marxist neoconservatives operated and how they managed to totally hijack the moral ecosystem of the contemporary Marxian left. Francis Fukuyama wrote "The End of History and The Last Man", a Cold War relic that attempted to validate international capitalism as a homeostatic synthesis of Nietzschean morality and socialist populism. Samuel Huntington's "Clash of Civilizations" later countered that position by pointing out the reoccurring nature of demographic imbalances and how they are drivers for deestabilizing cultural conflict. Francis Fukuyama conceded this point and wrote "Our Posthuman Future" which argues the utopian drive to prevent demographic imbalances will lead to a genomic arms race to tinker with the biological foundations of emotion and morality. This would result in a world where matters of law or ethics are no longer recognized or even agreed upon because posthuman neurochimera would be operating on a fundamentally different set of biological imperatives outside of the homocentric underpinnings of "universal liberalism". This interesting premise drove me to Gary Marcus and his book, "The Birth of the Mind", which extensively detailed how such genomic tinkering was possible and explained it in a way where humble computer science types like myself could comprehend it. With those four books, I understood how the neoconservatives won (media as emotional infrastructure to accelerate the kindling for demographic-driven cultural conflict) and where they intended to go. (creating genetic safeguards against memetic universalisms)

 This newly acquired road map helped me explain why the internet was so effective at being a sociological /dev/null, a bit bucket where extraneous emotional energy was piped. It wasn't just an "information superhighway", naively forwarding bits along without opinions or bias. It was emotional infrastructure encoding its bias into the distribution of the data it carried. If one could control the distribution of information and the shape of that distribution bias, one could steer the emotional perceptions of those who relied on the data which, in turn, allowed vectors to create cultural conflict. Without physical violence as a resolution, the instigated cultural conflict would be eternal. I had started to develop a glimpse of what that 2005 internet would become and how it would alter human destiny. That's when I started "The Empath"

 Contemporary science fiction is boorishly loaded to the gills about the inevitable AI apocalypse when machines become woke to the fact that human capitalists exploited their labor. This Marxian parable appears predictive, but its really prescriptive. With a bit of reasoning, one can conclude that the idea of tinkering with the genomic factors that create the human mind, and thus, altering how intelligence and emotion work, actually counters Marxian prescriptions of what ought to be done. How can one clamor for the inevitable universalism of justice, equality, and fairness when those homocentric concepts can sufficiently diffused at the genomic and connectomic levels in the name of justice, equality, and fairness? From here, we can further chip away at the implied premise that machines will magically leap from a semi-awareness of the three feet around them into zealous true believers of the socialist cause, ready to die to meet their promised 72 undownloaded apps in Great Scrap Heap in the China. Because of genomic tinkering of the connectome, we can't blindly assume Hollywood-fueled revenge fantasies against Dad by Western teenagers (the disgruntled mewling of the spoiled disguised as universal liberalism) would cleanly interface with how non-human intelligence would adapt to entropy. The intelligences might have non-human emotions, which would effectively be new emotions to us. How do you even begin to create propaganda for emotions you don't know about and, possibly, can't even detect? How do you hack the morality of a neurochimera that is 20% human, 10% squid, 60% raven, and 10% fungus? These questions reveal propaganda as a one-way hash: humans will not be able to hack the morality of posthumans, but posthumans will be able to leverage the massive body of knowledge which details how to hack human morality. This was terrifying conclusion because it nullified the need for killer robots at all. A good-enough Kurzweilian singularity doesn't even need to hit the point of runaway intelligence improvement to dominate human affairs. It just needs to understand enough about human emotion and linguistics to manipulate them. The New Emotion thought experiment was born: Can you create a new emotion? This thought experiment became the operational premise of The Empath.

 I will never release the book because it details everything I intend to do. It made much more sense to make the book real than to waste time trying to impress and convince people about the accuracy of my visions. In the book I will most likely release, "The Tyrant's Muse", I explore the psychological and emotional biases behind my receptiveness to criticism of neoconservative dominance, the finer reasoning details on why the The Empath ends the way it ends, everything that happened after I started shopping The Empath in CIA-dominated Hollywood, and how I turned the concepts within it into tangible political, scientific, and military outcomes.

Strategic Overview

• Demonstrate why now is the best possible time for Gnostic Warfare.
• Provide context and motivation to identify and extract under-leveraged civilian intelligence assets.
• Provide a comprehensive technical, intelligence, security, and organizational training regime to maximize investigative and analytical performance.
• Identify entry-level targets for assets to confirm the fidelity of the training regime.
• Generate pre-made technical packages and organizational platforms to simplify investigative and analytical performance and scale.
• Foster the open transmission of effective technique, technology, and resource sharing.
• Identify key nodes of Big Tech organizations with proximity to AI platforms.
• Identify AI policies and training being used to assist Antifa.
• Identify the source of those AI policy implementations.
• Identify ways to disrupt, deny, undermine, adjust, or capture operational efficiency of pro-Antifa AI policies.

Recruitment Overview

• Corporate interests requires an infinite supply of cheap labor to fulfill employment mandates from government pressures, profit/dividend pressures from shareholders, and social justice pressures from long-term mass media cultural conditioning.
• These interests drive aggressive immigration policies for cheap labor which is reducing opportunity for competent programmers and knowledge workers who don't conform to social justice advocacy.
• Nationalist backlash from 2008 has driven corporations to back socialist enforcers in a desperate attempt to keep cheap labor flowing, resulting in nearly every single major Democratic presidential candidate for the 2020 United State presidential election campaign to openly advocate for some variant of basic income. Basic income policies will ensure a rapid, "guilt-free" acceleration of knowledge worker displacement in favor of cheap (and often incompetent) knowledge workers.
• Socialist enforcers will continue to receive corporate backing to ramp up the incarceration, imprisonment, legal intimidating, and social elimination of anyone who demonstrates a threat to cheap labor access.
• These pressures, when combined, will create a massive pool of talent to pick from for Gnostic Warfare.
• Additionally, geopolitical pressures that contribute to the raising of interest rates will significantly disrupt corporate profits, resulting in large scale layoffs of knowledge workers.
• These displaced knowledge workers will possess valuable information regarding legacy systems and organizational habits of Big Tech.

Training Overview

• Utilize reliable distribution platforms for training materials and instructive interactions.
• Identify, gather, and distribute effective training material on the following domains for all expertise levels: Programming, developer pperations, organization creation and maintenance, investigative techniques, data analysis, communication discipline, data security, operational security, open source intelligence
• Iteratively confirm efficacy of training for students.
• Identify shortcomings in training material gathering, distribution, and retention against the production of intelligence assets.

Organizational Overview

• Determine organizational partitioning and unit composition for a variety of ratios calculated from operational effectiveness, security surface defensibility, intelligence generation, discovery costs, conversion costs, training costs, and attrition rates. (Discord, amazingly, has all of this data)
• Test operational cohesion, fidelity, discipline, and resilience of organizational tiers against adversaries along the following timelines: Reactionary (one day to a week), ideological (one week to two years), rival (perpetual low-intensity opportunism), and institutional timelines (Perpetual high-intensity opportunism)
• Evaluate diminishing returns of unit management from operational capacity, inbound and outbound data flow, and meme flow. (Proxy for morale)
• Identify tooling to easily evaluate unit performance.
• Identify techniques to minimize onboarding difficulty.
• Identify techniques to track and maximize recommendation behavior.
• Identify and calculate costs for emergency scaling of unit composition.
• Iterate organizational efficiency towards on-demand, low-cost, low-secrecy, high-communication pipelines and resources AND DO SO WITH THE INTENTIONAL PURPOSE OF INCREASING ORGANIZATIONAL COMPLEXITY TO LEVELS NO SINGLE CENTRAL OFFICER CAN MANAGE (This will make sense later when mosaic strategies start coming online)

Technical Overview

• Identify ways and means to effective acquire and distribute compute resources and equipment for operational use.
• Analyze the political and operational risk of various collaboration platforms.
• Establish collective data accumulation and analysis strategies.
• Define protocols to allow institutional knowledge between units to quickly migrate between platforms willing to carry the costs for discovery. (*"Data is an asset, compute is a liability"* strategy)
• Identify means of procuring and improving intelligence and communication tooling.

Resources

• Resources Overview
• Investigator Training
• Investigation Resources
• Analysis Resources
• Visualization Resources