An interesting log I've stumbled upon:
1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950515253545556575859606162636465666768697071727374757677787980818283848586878889909192939495969798991001011021031041051061071081091101111121131141151161171181191201211221231241251261271281291301311321331341351361371381391401411421431441451461471481491501511521531541551561571581591601611621631641651661671681691701711721731741751761771781791801811821831841851861871881891901911921931941951961971981992002012022032042052062072082092102112122132142152162172182192202212222232242252262272282292302312322332342352362372382392402412422432442452462472482492502512522532542552562572582592602612622632642652662672682692702712722732742752762772782792802812822832842852862872882892902912922932942952962972982993003013023033043053063073083093103113123133143153163173183193203213223233243253263273283293303313323333343353363373383393403413423433443453463473483493503513521: Remember months ago I mentioned that the alt right and 8chan and the like werepawns to be sacrificed?2: Yes.1: The time has come2: I'm listening.1: 8ch has been going after Correct The Record. They've also been scouring Sorosand the DNC leaks and Hillary leaks.2: Tight.1: I've been assisting with major efforts on the CTR campaign2: lol. of course you have.1: Primarily honeypot setups2: For what side?1: My side of course2: ROFL. go on.1: Now that the GamerGate logs have been released, the evidence is mounting upthat the Clinton Foundation, with Soros, has been staging multiple false flagculture events.2: Tight.1: Sort of an endless stream of them. Because of our efforts with CTR, Mrs.Clinton went on television last night and denounced the alt-right, 8chan,Brietbart. Those are the facts thus far.2: Yeah, I saw that.1: We now have to talk about the meta. I've told you about Huntington, yes?Samuel P. Huntington?2: Remind me again real quick.1: Marx says all conflict stems from the poor vs. the rich. Huntington says allconflict stems from people getting buttblasted and bringing in friends to help2: Yes, ok.1: Marx proposes an inevitable resolution of conflict, Huntington proposesinfinite escalation. From my early arguments online to the fracturing of4chan to GamerGate to 8chan, I've watched this infinite escalation happen.It's always the same ideological actors, rebranding themselves under a newcrusader banner. So I've worked hard to setup a trap.2: I assume you're alluding to something about perpetuating rise/fall conflicts.1: GamerGate did one thing very well. It created the tools and setup the outletsin which the loyal flock can retreat to. Those retreat centers becameideological bastions of purity. I egged on both sides with extremist rhetoricover the years, driving them further and further out of the middle. Usually,this tactic creates value OF the middle as people avoiding partisan extremismphysically meet up in places and trade stories. That's not how it worksanymore.2: "As people avoiding partisan extremism physically meet up in places andtrade stories" Like, bar folk?1: Yep. Or refugees. Or local communities. America has a long history ofrunning to the middle.2: Ok.1: That's no longer possible because of social networks. You see, when youdisagree with someone, you don't have to physically move yourself. You justblock a person. The end. Do this hundreds of times... block a post here orthere... And you create an echo chamber of things you like.2: Right.1: The middle has fragmented into individuals. Unreachable individuals.Totally inoculated from the partisans. Which means there is no way torally that middle to attack enemy partisans. This is how the right lostin the 1950s. They let the socialists rally the common emotional ground(with the help of highly consolidated mass media) with the unaligned topound the right into submission. The right still hasn't recovered fromthat. A small group of partisans amplified their influence by winning overthe unaligned. Those small groups became the owners and savants of mediaoutlets today.2: Ok, so it's repeating.1: Not just repeating but scaling. They didn't physically exterminate theright. They still exist. So they have to add more and more power andurgency to their mass media narrative. This is done to stave off diminishingreturns of the true believer. But the paradox is that the number of trueenemies has dwindled to nothingness.2: Ok.1: The mass media engine is so hysterical about saving itself that it isexerting tremendous amounts of energy to attack like 4 racist people inGeorgia. This is just diminishing returns. The DNC has worked overtime toinclude more minorities to scale to. Gays, muslims, etc. Just to have newcontexts to repeat their success. But it hasn't been working so well.2: Why?1: Numbers and cultural libertarianism.2: Too small?1: Numbers of minorities are fine. Historically similar to other points inleftist cultural victory. Blacks were ~14% during Civil Rights. Homosexualsare 10%. It's not about the number of the minority anymore. It's about thenumber of unaligned actors. That's the number that has dropped dramatically.It's like using a huge stick and a fulcrum to move a pillow. The internet hasmade reaching the unaligned cheaper than ever, but it has also mande fracturingthem into splinters cheaper as well. This naturally drove up the cost ofreaching them. Clinton and the DNC (for election reasons) and Obama (forpost-president foundation reasons, I have an inside track on that one) want arepeat of Civil Rights, but the conditions aren't the same. They can no longerrally the mass unaligned with siren songs of positivity and peace to steer themagainst the right. The cuckservatives still fear the lash of the last 40 years.But the alt right has no reference for it. Without it, the alt right isrealizing there is nothing actually stopping them.2: That's why Gary is around. to lure the unaligned.1: He will fail for the reasons I've mentioned above. The reachable unalignedare media drunk partisans who are just afraid of picking a side because itreduces the potential of their social capital. The unreachable unaligned areEVERYWHERE and in UGE numbers. The alt right is realizing no populist forceof merit can oppose them. The CTR attacks we've been doing... it's likefishing with dynamite man. So, with that, here's the play based on all ofthis, the play I wanted years ago as you know.2: I'm listening.1: When the DNC hits the point where they start to detect diminishing returns tothe narrative. they have always escalated. They prefer soft power plausibledeniability escalation, but when that is exhausted, they will not shy awayfrom hard power escalation. Given the *chans creation of GamerGate, the heavyLinux communities, and the assault on all things culture libertarian about3-4 years ago and the creation of 8chan due to the subsequent exodus, all signs\point to a central campaign since very beginning. The DNC needs to createa new KKK.2: To get more non-partisans attention?1: No. To justify the new round of government expansion. "We have to protectyour safe space from BULLY X and to do that, we're just gonna need more powerover the internet :)".2: Ok, so we're not talking about the unaligned anymore..1: They can't reach the non-partisans anymore. This whole effort boils down tothe theories of one person: His name is Cass Sunstein.2: What's the role?1: Architect.2: Of?1: His book is called " Democracy and the Problem of Free Speech".2: A model?1: A summary: “Sunstein co-authored a 2008 paper with Adrian Vermeule, titled“Conspiracy Theories,” dealing with the risks and possible government responsesto false conspiracy theories resulting from “cascades” of faulty informationwithin groups that may ultimately lead to violence. In this article they wrote,“The existence of both domestic and foreign conspiracy theories, we suggest,is no trivial matter, posing real risks to the government’s antiterrorismpolicies, whatever the latter may be.” They go on to propose that, “the bestresponse consists in cognitive infiltration of extremist groups” They suggest,among other tactics, “Government agents (and their allies) might enter chatrooms, online social networks, or even real-space groups and attempt to underminepercolating conspiracy theories by raising doubts about their factual premises,causal logic or implications for political action.” “The authors declare thatthere are five responses a government can take toward conspiracy theories: “Wecan readily imagine a series of possible responses. Government might banconspiracy theorizing. Government might impose some kind of tax, financial orotherwise, on those who disseminate such theories. Government might itselfengage in counterspeech, marshaling arguments to discredit conspiracy theories.Government might formally hire credible private parties to engage incounterspeech. Government might engage in informal communication with suchparties, encouraging them to help.” However, the authors advocate that each“instrument has a distinctive set of potential effects, or costs and benefits,and each will have a place under imaginable conditions. However, our main policyidea is that government should engage in cognitive infiltration of the groupsthat produce conspiracy theories, which involves a mix of (3), and (5).”1: This guy was appointed by Obama to work with the NSA to bring "civilianoversight" into play to do all of these things. Once I became aware of themethodology, I analyzed his theories for the flaw. I found it, and I startedputting the trap into place. The trap is based on two gambles:1: The first is that the unreachable unaligned are too expensive even for the NSA.Based on Sunstein's own works, his entire thesis is central actor-specific anddoes not involve mass participation. Thus, Sunstein's fatal flaw is that heworks exclusively on the nodes of negative actors in question and not on theevolution of ramifications. I gambled that the NSA has no plans or budget toimprove the mass reception of their counternarratives. All they have isreactnarrative.2: Reactspeech. Reactspeech doesn't reach the unaligned..1: They might have budgets to craft and steer counternarratives, but they haveabsolutely zero way to increase the efficiacy of the reception of counternattive.Sunstein, literally, never considered that part of the domain.2: Ok..1: This means Sunstein is blind to the unreachable unaligned problem. The secondgamble is the death wish that happens when you suppress a culture for decadesand generations at a time. The traditional right has been deemed the enemy ofeverything for so long, even their political representatives believe it. Thisleaves true believers with an option: restore social capital and renounce orspend social capital and assert. The hilarious part is that right wing ideologyis deeply rooted in self-sufficiency. So Sunstein's idea of imposing a tax on"social capital" for wrongthink in this paradigm is at fault as well. The leftthinks social capital only in leftist terms and cannot understand rightistsocial capital.2: Yeah, you're losing me a bit here..1: How so?2: Explain social capital in applicable terms..1: The Left sees social capital is the model that every individual action increasesor costs status among their peers.2: Ok..1: Thus, their hyper obsession with virtue signalling.2: And in reference to true believers?1: The right sees social capital as something VERY different. The don't see it asa gamble. The left sees social capital as a gambling chip whose payout trendstowards profit upon proper cultural synchronization. The right sees socialcapital as a vital assets to cultivate over time via risk mitigation andreinvestment. This means Sunstein's infiltration theory only works on LEFTISTcommunities!2: LOL. got it..1: Any attempt to infiltrate a rightist community will reinforce the value oftheir terms of social capital. For example, rightest social capital conversationlooks like this: "Oh, we're under attack. must be the damn jews again" "Yep,probably the jews" "hail kek!". A leftist, on the other hand, will seeinfiltration as a threat to their accumulated social capital and will seek topurge it.2: LOL. It does out the cucks though..1: Exactly. It only works on leftists. Under the spirit of infiltration, therightist theory of social capital GAINS value.2: Right.1: Which means that they forge communities through mutual trial of self-sufficiency.This creates two ways of managing failure and death. The first is: If you showyour power level and get caught, that was on you for treating your socialcapital the way a leftist would. You gambled your social capital instead ofreinvesting it. The second is: Once I am deprived of my social capitalthrough force, my life is of no value, and I will die.2: LOL.1: Which means, they have a built-in martyr complex. Not the attention seekingmartyrs like from the 1960s and 1990s, but a willingness towards totalself-sacrifice once deprived of all social capital.2: So... you can't have social capital in an echo chamber? People's entireinner circles are echo chambers though and they're just fine with it.1: You can, but it's no different than printing your own currency. Socialcapital in an echo chamber just inflates endlessly to the point of absoluteworthlessness, but it keeps the partisans are intoxicated.2: So then social capital isn't needed..1: So, to summarize everything:- The Left won the culture war in the 1960s- The Left uses mass media narratives to suppress the Right because outrightgenocide is still frowned upon- When narratives fail, the Left always escalates: first soft, then hard- Social media, an in particular, blocking/banning/filtering, has resulted inecho chambers that intoxicate the partisan, but make the unaligned mostlyunreachable by those partisans- Sunstein's model on countering low-probability, high-impact externalitieshas lead him directly into precrime territory to diffuse potential violatorsof his models- Sunstein works with the NSA to infiltrate these groups based on underminingthe value of their social capital- Sunstein unwittingly can only target Leftist social capital as his tacticsstrengthen the social capital of Rightist communities.1: Care to guess the next step based on these conclusions?2: Sunstein seems stuck.1: He doesn't know it/ In fact, he thinks the sky's the limit. It's REALLYimportant for him to think that. The next step you will see in full view.8chan will be aggressively targeted. After Hillary's speech, the mass mediaengines are already lining up. CTR is flooding the place with Poe's Law.Posts like "HEY BROTHERS I KILLED A BLACK BABY!" then suddenly, mass mediareports on it. There will be lots and lots of attempts to try and steer 8chaninto nothing more than a dirt-tier skinhead community. CTR already have thepipeline setup. They will create the post. Then their agents will bump it.Then they'll leak it to their contacts in mass media. And thus, the DNC getstheir new KKK to scare the minorities with.2: Makes sense..1: They think this can steer the unaligned into supporting Hillary, but thatwon't work.2: That's what I was trying to say before. oh... go on..1: The left has already established their echo chambers. Echo chambers thatcannot reach the unaligned. It will fail miserably.2: Have you found a cost efficient way to reach the unaligned? what's the gameplan here?1: Yes. and I'll get to that in a moment. Meanwhile, my team will honeypot theever living fuck out of CTR. We're been building up a network of fake leftistinfluencers that appear sympathetic.2: Honeypots for what purpose?1: Exposing logs, emails, chats, and transactions between CTR, Clinton, and theDNC. But that's nothing but standard op reqs. Once the DNC sees how littleimpact this massive effort has, they will take whatever false consensus theirmedia outlets have forged and run with that to pass sweeping laws to ban"hate communities" and "conspiracy theorists".2: Sunsteins 1 & 2.1: Then the arrests happen. Then the botched arrests resulting in incapacitationand execution happen. The FBI has been seeding CP in the chans for years.2: LOL.1: They did that to establish and pressure informants and mods. They have quitethe circus already lined up to roll out in front of the cameras to show justhow bad 8chan is and just how needed these news laws are.2: Right..1: The laws are a reaction to the fact that centralized government can no longerreach the middle.2: Makes sense..1: As mentioned before, centralized infiltration, as is evident in Sunstein'smusings, shows no outreach program to the unaligned. Their only plan is toengage in perpetual demonization of the fringes to support centralized modesof government. Once these laws happen and the arrests start, then theunaligned will finally be brought into it.. but not as supporters.... aspotential terrorists. The alt-right and the chans will be mass detained andthe world will cheer, which will setup a cycle of greater and greaterdetainment. Mrs. Clinton has already made mention of going after thoseengaging in wrongthink. Meanwhile, her false echo chambers will shouw: "Westopped hate! YAaaaay!" This will result in more and more innocent peoplebeing targeted by these draconian laws and no amount of mass media will workto smooth it out because of the very layout of echo chambers today.2: You're trying to force the unaligned to be partisan..1: Bingo. The targeted will be deeply anti-centralized government partisan afterthis.2: I suppose they could support govt out of fear as well..1: Some, but American's don't fear government. They fear loss of social capitaland most people have a rightest model of social capital.2: Social capital or die? isn't that kind of a human thing?1: That's the natural intuitive model humans have all over the world. The anomalyis the leftist mode of social capital. It usually requires generations ofurbanization to normalize that model and we're still two or three shy of fullBabylon.2: The leftist perspective isn't breeding?1: They certainly do have a penchant for abortion, don't they? My position isthis: If two people are arguing about the interior decoration theme of the room,you can engage in debate and try and negotiate a diplomatic solution.. or youcan set the house on fire and watch them unify to put it out. The soonercentralized government is forced to be overtly tyrannical, the sooner we willhave the resources to undermine it.2: technological resources?1: Mass human involvement and participation. It's a big reason I support Clinton.2: I get what you're saying but I think you believe something I don't..1: She's the primal force of 1960s entitlement special snowflakechip-on-the-shoulder insecurity. The type that brings nuclear weapons to aknife fight.2: It sounds like you're saying at the basis of human nature is still a desirefor social capital based on self-sufficiency .1: No. The desire is unimportant. The basis of human nature is discoveringways you as the individual can safely accumulate social capital and minimizerisk of loss. That basis is how the rightist model of social capital works.2: "most people have a Rightist model of social capital" ˂- what's the point ofthat then?1: It just happens to be that self-sufficient credos and ethos align with howthat discovery plays out on average2: And you think human involvement will just show up in opposition to tyranny?1: Nope2: Bottom line this for me then. I don't see where you're going..1: I believe human involvement will be forced to engage in acts that underminethat tyranny.2: How is that possible?1: Have you been looking into Venezuela recently?2: Not recently. I just know their recourses are falling apart and people aretrying to leave..1: Generations of extreme leftist overreaction to protect the government's monopolyon oil exports to pay for their self-righteous moral paradise. But then oilprices tanked. Now you have an entire generation of engineers, PhDs, graduates,and academics fleeing the city due to MASSIVE crime and ending up panhandlinggold and digging in toxic mines to barely make enough money, but way more thanthey'd make on the dole in the city... a dole which, mind you, favors politicalsupporters over opposition and the unaligned. Care to guess how many peoplehave socialism in Venezuela now?2: Most.1: I would argue that these people, if given the opportunity, would elect a populistto overtly overthrow that government. Even by violent means. No hand-wringing.No arguing over moral righteousness. No concerns over legacy and the rightside of history.2: Are they functional enough for that?1: Create an ecosystem where populists compete for influence (which isn't hardsince the people who already support that populist have ALREADY sorted themselvesinto echo chambers) And poof, out comes the elements of a new regime :D2: So then we can watch this, like, watch this happen there?1: Yep.2: Timeframe?1: Two to five years.2: Nice..1: Usually accelerated once foreign powers realize the situation and pour moneyinto it.2: What do they have to gain?1: Puppet state, better trade terms, cheaper resources, less threatening militaryneighbors, expansion of geopolitical sphere, etc.2: Ok..1: The Alt-right will burn. And nothing will rise from it's ashes.2: You've explained this all before. just not in this amount of step-by-stepdetail..1: Sunstein will believe he's achieved victory, but little does he know he onlymade the destruction of leftist social capital the policy of the establishment :DRightist social capital will flourish because of him.